Envisioning BYU
Volume Two
As I ponder BYU and its mission, I am in awe of the vision for this school that has been expressed by prophets and presidents across the decades. I submit that our task in the second half of BYU’s second century is to claim the prophecies of the past and become the university that has been foretold. While we have made important progress, much remains to be done. Becoming BYU will require each of us to lean into the university mission—to fully embrace the uniqueness that is our greatest strength.
To help us achieve this goal, I commend to you this second volume of Envisioning BYU. It builds on the foundation of volume one and includes additional speeches pertaining to the university’s vital role in the world. I invite all of us to prayerfully study these messages. They will bless us with a sense of divine purpose and will facilitate revelation about our critical roles in helping the university become BYU.
As we labor together in this inspired cause, may we heed President Spencer W. Kimball’s invitation from his second-century address: “Lengthen your stride, quicken your step, and . . . continue your journey.” I am confident that as we do so, we will be granted heaven’s help.
This second volume of Envisioning BYU builds on the foundational and visionary speeches in the first volume—particularly “The Basic Constitution of Church Education” (selections from Doctrine and Covenants 88, 90, and 93) and President Spencer W. Kimball’s address “The Second Century of Brigham Young University.”
In Doctrine and Covenants 88, the Lord charged Joseph Smith to establish a house of faith and learning.1 This divine injunction was partially realized by the building of the Kirtland Temple and the establishment of the School of the Prophets and is frequently echoed in reference to BYU and other schools of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They, too, are to be houses of faith and learning, where worthy participants can learn and be taught “by study and also by faith.”2 In his second-century address, President Kimball charged BYU to be a “unique light” in the academic firmament.3 This charge has been reiterated often on campus, especially of late. This volume is intended to deepen readers’ understanding of BYU’s aspirations to teach and learn by study and by faith and to be a unique light.
Volume 2 is divided into two thematic units corresponding to these prophetic injunctions: section one is titled “A House of Faith and Learning”; section two is titled “A Unique Light.” In addition, a third section, “On Learning and Light at BYU,” offers ten brief perspectives about how BYU’s unique learning and teaching environment can help the university fulfill its divinely appointed destiny.
The book closes with two stirring talks given at the inauguration of C. Shane Reese as the fourteenth president of the university. The contents of this volume can be found electronically at speeches.byu.edu /envisioning-BYU.
The two thematic units are framed by talks from President Dallin H. Oaks. “A House of Faith” was given early in his tenure as BYU president. In it he reflected on both President Kimball’s second-century address and Doctrine and Covenants 88, which he called “the first and greatest revelation of this dispensation on the subject of education” and “still the basic constitution of Church education.” President Oaks added that the revelation “defines Brigham Young University’s role in the kingdom.”4 The final talk by President Oaks was delivered almost a half century later, based on his long acquaintance with BYU and on his current perspective as a counselor in the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In this talk, titled “Going Forward in the Second Century,” President Oaks highlighted the importance of BYU’s remaining unique. I hope that these book- ends from President Oaks, who has watched the university reach toward its potential over the last fifty years, will give perspective to all the entries in between.
In Doctrine and Covenants 88 we read a touching salutation that teachers were to give to students in the School of the Prophets:
I salute you in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, in token or remembrance of the everlasting covenant, in which covenant I receive you to fellowship, in a determination that is fixed, immovable, and unchangeable, to be your friend and brother through the grace of God in the bonds of love.5
The spirit of this salutation should characterize all our relationships on campus. I offer it “in the bonds of love” to readers of Envisioning BYU, confident that if the university’s faculty, staff, and students will engrave the sentiments contained herein on their hearts and embed the discourses in these volumes deep in campus culture, BYU will fulfill the inspired mission that prophets and leaders have long envisioned for it.
— John S. Tanner
Notes
1. See Doctrine and Covenants 88:119.
2. Doctrine and Covenants 88:118.
3. Spencer W. Kimball, “The Second Century of Brigham Young University,” BYU devotional address, 10 October 1975.
4. Dallin H. Oaks, “A House of Faith,” BYU annual university conference address, 31 August 1977.
5. Doctrine and Covenants 88:133.
Justin Collings was associate dean and professor in the BYU Law School when he delivered this stirring devotional address. Soon thereafter, he was appointed as associate academic vice president for faculty development, and he currently serves as academic vice president. His visionary devotional articulates the idea of BYU, understanding “idea” in the way that John Henry Newman spoke of the idea of the university, meaning its purpose or aims (see The Idea of a University [Longmans, Green and Co: London, 1925]).
Collings encouraged BYU students to seek holiness, learning, revelation, the best gifts, Christlike exemplars, and, above all, the Savior Himself. Collings’s devotional touches on many of the themes in Envisioning BYU. As such, it provides a fitting preface for this volume as well as a primer for all the volumes in the series.
“Seek learning, even by study and also by faith. . . . And establish a house, even a house of prayer, a house of fasting, a house of faith, a house of learning, a house of glory, a house of order, a house of God.”
—Doctrine and Covenants 88:118–19

Dallin H. Oaks was president of Brigham Young University when he delivered this seminal address to university employees. He discussed the vision of education set forth by the Lord and prophets in such revelations as the Olive Leaf, found in Doctrine and Covenants 88, and President Spencer W. Kimball’s revelatory address “The Second Century of Brigham Young University.” President Oaks then elaborated on the principles that BYU must adhere to in order to realize such a future. Referring to President Kimball’s words, President Oaks asked and then answered the question “How are we to achieve that prophetic destiny as ‘the fully anointed university of the Lord’?”

Boyd K. Packer was a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles when he delivered this address explaining how the BYU Board of Trustees makes decisions in unity. He also discussed threats on the horizon facing BYU and other religiously affiliated universities. Elder Packer spoke encouragingly of BYU’s future: in a field of predominantly secular universities, BYU can stand out by using the catalyst of the Spirit to blend academic and spiritual pursuits.

Bruce C. Hafen was provost of Brigham Young University when he delivered this address. He spoke first about BYU as a distinctive institution that has serious dual allegiances to a “red world” of academics and a “blue world” of the Church. He then explored the challenges and blessings “of BYU’s exciting life in the land of the purple overlap,” where people take seriously both halves of the divine injunction to “seek learning, even by study and also by faith” (Doctrine and Covenants 88:118).

Kristine Hansen was a professor of English and associate dean of Honors and General Education when she delivered this inspiring devotional on BYU’s aims. She reflected deeply and lucidly on each aim, which she compared to facets of a towering mountain, ultimately encouraging faculty, staff, and students to unite in their efforts to live the aims and ascend together as they help BYU fulfill its divine destiny. Although her remarks are primarily addressed to students, they can and should be internalized by all who come to work, study, or serve at the university.

Susan W. Tanner was serving as the Young Women general president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and was serving on the BYU Board of Trustees when she delivered this address. She encouraged the BYU campus community to learn by heart, a rarely discussed aspect of one of BYU’s aims—lifelong learning. Sister Tanner emphasized that when an individual learns by heart, the truths become internalized and can then lift, inspire, and change the heart.

Bonnie Brinton, a nationally recognized speech-language pathologist, was a professor in the BYU Department of Communication Disorders and dean of BYU Graduate Studies when she delivered this address. Brinton spoke to the blessing of working at BYU, where scholars “can use information gained through spiritual means at the same time that [they are] observing and testing the phenomena in the world around [them].” She related this ability to be “bilingual”—as President Spencer W. Kimball called it in his address “The Second Century of Brigham Young University”—to the anableps, a fish that can see simultaneously what is above and below the waterline.
This text has been excerpted from an address delivered at the conference “Inquiry, Scholarship, and Learning and Teaching in Religiously Affiliated Colleges and Universities,” held at Brigham Young University; it was subsequently published in BYU Studies 49, no. 2 (2010): 25–29.

John S. Tanner was serving as academic vice president when he delivered this address during the faculty session of university conference. He based his remarks on the Lord’s great revelation on education—Doctrine and Covenants 88, or the Olive Leaf—which established the School of the Prophets. Tanner emphasized the connection between school and temple in Latter-day Saint history and doctrine, as well as the importance of all learning of all. He spoke of the need for learners and teachers to be worthy and to walk together as brothers and sisters bound by shared commandments and covenants “in the bonds of love” (Doctrine and Covenants 88:133).

James R. Rasband was serving as academic vice president when he delivered this address. He situated his topic by observing how the restored gospel “rejects either-or choices in favor of both-and possibilities.” Note how instead of or, the restored gospel uses and in these dichotomies: “It is not faith or works but faith and works. It is not a choice between body or spirit but a recognition that both body and spirit constitute the soul of man.” Likewise BYU consistently straddles seeming contraries, such as learning by study and by faith. The faculty in BYU’s house of learning must negotiate tensions between these paired aspirations, each making legitimate and even compelling competing claims.
“There are many ways in which BYU can tower above other universities—not simply because of the size of its student body or its beautiful campus spread out below magnificent mountains but by the unique light BYU can send forth into the educational world.”
—Spencer W. Kimball

David O. McKay was a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles when he authored this article. Elder McKay believed deeply in the value of Church schools, where students could study all subjects in the light of the gospel, deepen their testimonies, and develop noble character traits. He helped preserve Brigham Young University as an exception to the Church’s general policy of divesting itself of Church schools. Later, as Church president, he founded BYU–Hawaii and the Church College of New Zealand.
For further comments on the importance of President McKay’s vision to BYU, see Bruce C. Hafen’s address “Religious Education in BYU’s Prophetic Historical Context” in Envisioning BYU Volume 1: Foundations and Dreams.

As Church commissioner of education during BYU’s centennial year (1975), Neal A. Maxwell wrote an article for the Ensign magazine explaining why The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would have a university like BYU. In it he touched on many of the same themes President Spencer W. Kimball articulated in his address “The Second Century of Brigham Young University,” emphasizing the need for BYU to remain “deliberately different,” even unique, in “meeting its rendezvous with destiny.” This text has been excerpted.

Spencer W. Kimball was president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when he delivered this charge to new BYU president Jeffrey R. Holland. He repeated many key points from his address “The Second Century of Brigham Young University,” thus fixing his prophetic expectations about BYU’s mission even more deeply into the university. In one paragraph of particular note, President Kimball altered slightly the language from his second-century address, changing become unique to remain unique.

Dallin H. Oaks was serving as chair of the executive committee of the BYU Board of Trustees and as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles when he delivered this address. He spoke of the challenges BYU faces in becoming a “great university of the Lord—not in the world’s way but in the Lord’s way.” This talk figured prominently in a speech given a few months later by President Kevin J Worthen, titled “BYU: A Unique Kind of Education.”

As president of Brigham Young University, Kevin J Worthen explained to faculty and staff how BYU offers a unique kind of education by linking “faith-based teaching and student-centered research.” Building on then Elder Dallin H. Oaks’s address “Challenges to the Mission of Brigham Young University,” given earlier that year, President Worthen articulated how BYU can achieve its “prophetically proclaimed destiny . . . in a way that is different from that by which other universities have achieved their greatness.”

David A. Bednar was a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles when he delivered this address and spoke of Joseph Smith’s promise that the work of the Lord will go forward. Elder Bednar encouraged BYU’s leaders to “look unto [the Savior] in every thought; doubt not, fear not” (Doctrine and Covenants 6:36). He emphasized that looking without fear to God rather than to the world means heeding President Spencer W. Kimball’s repeated warnings to “resist anything that would rob BYU of its basic uniqueness in its second century” (“The Second Century of Brigham Young University”). Elder Bednar invited the campus community to remember and apply President Kimball’s counsel.

Kevin J Worthen was serving as president of the university when he delivered this address and introduced the BYU Statement on Belonging and the creation of the Office of Belonging. He reminded the campus community of Elder David A. Bednar’s invitation to hearken to President Spencer W. Kimball’s admonition to use “gospel methodology, concepts, and insights . . . to do what the world cannot do in its own frame of reference” (Kimball, “The Second Century of Brigham Young University”; quoted in Bednar, “Look unto Me in Every Thought”). President Worthen explained how both the substance of the BYU Statement on Belonging and the process of arriving at it through counseling in councils draw on gospel methodology, concepts, and insights. He also reflected on President Kimball’s prophetic expectations for BYU to “remain a unique university in all the world” (“Installation of and Charge to the President”; emphasis added).

C. Shane Reese was BYU academic vice president when he delivered this address to faculty members, building on an admonition given to the university only months earlier by Elder David A. Bednar (see “Look unto Me in Every Thought”). Elder Bednar had challenged university leadership to take to heart President Spencer W. Kimball’s admonitions for BYU to remain unique as it pursued academic distinction in its second century (see “Installation of and Charge to the President”). Focusing on what makes BYU unique, Vice President Reese stressed the importance of using gospel methodologies to address university problems, of honing research mentoring at the university, and of applying “mission-fit” criteria when making hiring decisions.

Clark G. Gilbert, serving as commissioner of the Church Educational System, published this essay on the fate of the religious university a few months after he gave a BYU devotional address that touched on the same topic (see “Christ’s Peace in Perilous Times,” 8 February 2022). In both pieces, he reminded BYU to hold fast to its unique mission, as so many initially religious universities have failed to do.
Elder Gilbert calls for “courageous leadership” at religiously aligned colleges and universities to maintain their religious identity. His is a clarion call not only to BYU but to all “religious universities and faith-oriented faculty to deepen their confidence in the power of religious strength identity,” which “is not only important to a religious community, but it strengthens the academy and society more generally.” Therefore, he concludes, “Do not hide your light under a bushel. . . . Dare to be different in ways that are true to your distinctive light.”

Dallin H. Oaks was serving as first counselor in the First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when he delivered this address. As BYU approached its sesquicentennial, President Oaks and a number of BYU devotional speakers reflected on President Spencer W. Kimball’s challenge to “become a unique university in all of the world” (“The Second Century of Brigham Young University”). President Oaks’s counsel was born of long and deep observation of BYU and the American academy generally. He spoke of an experience in the 1970s when BYU broke with the educational establishment in order to assert eternal principles. He also challenged students to “dare to be different” (quoting Clark G. Gilbert, “Dare to Be Different”) from the world when the world does not follow the Lord’s way, emphasizing the principle that the second commandment (love of neighbor) does not come ahead of the first great commandment (love of God).
“We have a marvelous promise for expansion of our ways of knowing: the magnification of the soul, body, and spirit and intelligence—light and truth—in each of us. Thus God’s glory is the growth of our intelligence, our unique light, the original matter of our very being.”
—Elaine S. Marshall
“Our task, I submit, is to claim in our day the prophecies of the past.”
—C. Shane Reese

It may strike some as odd for President C. Shane Reese to speak of “becoming BYU” moments after receiving stewardship of the university. Is not the institution he was asked to lead already BYU? But President Reese clearly had in mind something more than BYU’s name. As President Reese said, “Our task is to become the university that prophets have foretold” (page 306). He then quoted President Spencer W. Kimball’s admonition to become “the fully anointed university of the Lord about which so much has been spoken in the past” (Kimball, “The Second Century of Brigham Young University”). “Becoming BYU” refers not just to the name of BYU but to how well BYU measures up to its prophetic potential in the eyes of God.
President Reese enumerated several dimensions of BYU’s prophetic mission, including strengthening its student-centric approach; maintaining a focus on undergraduate teaching; promoting the language of scholarship and of faith; being willing to be unique; building a covenant community; and giving priority to mission-aligned hiring. If this list feels familiar, that is as it should be. The inaugural enacts the passing of a prophetic-mission baton from one president to another.

D. Todd Christofferson was serving as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles and a representative of the BYU Board of Trustees when he delivered this address. He spoke about the way a BYU president is chosen and how it is unique to the Church Educational System. As Elder Christofferson indicated, a small group of General Authorities, working closely with the First Presidency, identifies and carefully reviews potential candidates. Then, based on careful eval- uation and acting under the inspiration of Heaven, a choice is made. The process involves both rational assessment and revelation.
It must have been gratifying to President Reese, as it was to the BYU community, when Elder Christofferson testified, “As we worked with the First Presidency in this process, I can attest that all of us felt guided to Shane Reese as the person for this moment and time. Getting to know Wendy confirmed the rightness of that feeling” (page 317).
Elder Christofferson spoke of the importance of maintaining “eternal verities” in the midst of an uncertain and disunified world (page 319). He closed his remarks with a prayer, inviting all associated with the university to remember the Savior.
A little hope in your inbox.